Tuesday, November 22, 2011

In Time

What I liked about In Time, the 2011 motion picture starring Amanda Seyfried and Justin Timberlake:

  • The concept that everyone in the film, even the 85-year-olds and the 67-year-olds all look like they're 25 years old.  Everyone in the film looks 25, except the kids under 25.  It's like a preview of the New World.

  • The automobiles.  There were three basic styles, based upon, I dunno, something like a Kennedy-era Daddy Wagon Lincoln, maybe a 70's Dodge Charger, and a 70's era Bob-tail Caddy.   They're nearly all painted flat black and hum with their futuristic electric motors.

  • The performance by Vincent Kartheiser as the 85-year-old Phillipe Weis was good.  It was Wendy who pointed out that, though he looked 25, he acted 85.

  • The basic idea that the currency of the future is time, which can easily be passed from hand to hand (wrist to wrist) between people.

  • Oh yeah... Olivia Wilde, briefly.



What I didn't like about In Time, the 2011 motion picture co-starring Cillian Murphy:

  1. The juvenile dialogue, which seemed written by a 15-year-old.

  2. There was a chase through a restaurant kitchen and a bowl of tossed salad got knocked up into the air and salad went everywhere.   Please...

  3. The two-bit thug villain had a stupid stereotypical English cockney accent, a la Firefly.  Please...

  4. The atrocious special effects crime of having an expensive sports car careen off the edge, then cutting to an obvious plastic model, blurred and in slow motion, crashing down a dirt embankment.

My feeling is that this B movie (maybe it's a B+) will come and go with scarcely a stir, and then later on perhaps become sort of a minor cult favorite.  After all, the concept is pretty original.

After all, one reason we went to see it is that it's somehow related to a movie many people loved: Gattaca.